Jan 29 2008

When Did Religion Become A Bad Word?

Published by Michael at 9:20 pm under General, Politics

Is the rejection of religion on all fronts a reaction to the recent rise in ultra-conservative groups, or is there something else going on? I have been talking to a lot of friends and co-workers recently who are rejecting candidates on both sides of the presidential race because of their religion. What struck me is that these rejections are not because of the specific religion these hopefuls have, such as Mormon or Baptist, but because they have strong religious convictions at all.

InterfaithNow I could actually more understand rejecting a candidate for his specific religion than for the fact that they are religious at all. And as far as I have been able to ascertain, I don’t think any of the current mainstream presidential wannabes is planning on turning the oval office into a pulpit. But, I would readily welcome a candidate who is an intelligent religious person. I would find it heartening to elect a leader who has been through the questioning phase of any religious journey and come out with a better understanding of themselves and what they believe in.

Unfortunately I believe that many people are trying to take the separation of church and state a little too far. Instead of making sure that government makes no laws that would impede the freedom of religion, there is a current wave to instead have the government act in such a way that it takes away the freedom to have a religion. I firmly believe that to be truly open and free in our religion (or lack thereof for some), we must allow others to have theirs. If not, aren’t we just as bad and dogmatic as those who would force their religion upon us?

Print

Related posts:

  1. Health Care Reform and President Obama

Tags: , ,

5 responses so far

5 Responses to “When Did Religion Become A Bad Word?”

  1. BunGirlon 29 Jan 2008 at 11:24 pm

    You know, I’ve been saying this for a long time. I think it’s a shame that our society has come to this, but it seems that the very people who talk about the need for tolerance are the least tolerant where religion is concerned.

  2. Michaelon 30 Jan 2008 at 7:34 am

    BunGirl – Agreed. If you are only tolerant or accepting of what you agree with, that doesn’t go very far.

  3. Øyvindon 31 Jan 2008 at 7:30 am

    Blasfemy!

    No just kidding.

    I agree. We have that problem in Norway. Most people are within the state church, but the schools are not allowed to teach our religion because people in Norway have so many religions. It is almost funny. In respect for all religions it is not allowed to talk about religion – can you believe that?

    Amen

  4. A.on 15 Feb 2008 at 2:06 pm

    Very interesting point. And a very difficult question.

    I’m especially sensitive to this because I was brought up Protestant when I should really have been Catholic (Irish Italian parentage) and now I have a French daughter-in-law who was educated as a Catholic but is Muslim. The wedding (after the compulsory French state civil ceremony) was conducted by a Chruch of England minister but with readings from the Koran. It was the most moving ceremony I could have imagined.

    It can be done. We can live in harmony.

    A.’s last blog post..Peace

  5. susieon 18 Aug 2009 at 7:57 am

    “In respect for all religions it is not allowed to talk about religion – can you believe that?”

    Wow. Funny and odd. I heard that recently on a program on EWTN. A lay person, or a Bishop from Sweden said the same thing.

    It’s got to be the winner of the “Irony Award” today!
    susie´s last blog ..To learn a new language… My ComLuv Profile

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv Enabled







Imagine a religion that embraces many different beliefs... including yours.